ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 14 papers. The topics discussed include: lifestyles and their relationship with the psychological status of postgraduate students in the area of physical activity;impact of a remote supervised moderate interval training on cognitive functions in Mexican older adults. a preliminary study;bone diameters and their association with causes of health risk in college athletes;an online home exercise program changes lower body strength, nutritional status but not depression scores during the COVID-19 in Mexican elderly;anxiety symptoms in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intervention of physical exercise through social networks;leger test as a specific protocol to estimate the maximum oxygen consumption in the urban search and rescue division of the fire department of Tijuana, Mexico;effect of physical exercise on natural killer cells;effects of a 16-session high intensity interval training program on body composition in sedentary subjects;and resistance training using time under tension improves the muscle quality and muscle mass in healthy-young women. a preliminary study.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Atypical chest pain, fatigue, and palpitations can be seen in post-coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) period. With the hypothesis of explaining these complaints, we evaluated the exercise stress test (EST) parameters in COVID-19 patients with mild disease. Material(s) and Method(s): Between the ages of 30-50 years, who had mild COVID-19 in the last 3-9 months, were taken as the COVID-19 group [n=80, male/female (M/F): 40/40]. A total of 160 patients were included, of which age and gender matched 80 patients (M/F: 40/40) without COVID-19 were the control group. During the EST, baseline heart rate HR1(beats/min), baseline systolic, diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) (SBP1, DBP1), maximum blood pressures (SBPmax, DBPmax), and blood pressure changes (DELTASBP, DELTADBP) were recorded. As EST parameters, Duke score, exercise time (min), ST change (mm), exercise capacity (METs), maximum reached HR (% beats/min), distance walked (m), maximum oxygen consumption amount (VO2max mL/kg/min), rate pressure product (RPP mmHg/min/1000), and heart HR recovery 1 (HRR1 beats/min) was used. Result(s): In the COVID-19 group, baseline HR1, SBP1, DBP1, SBPmax, DBPmax, DELTASBP, DELTADBP, VO2max, and RPP were higher, while distance walked and HRR1 were less. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of Duke score, exercise duration, ST change and exercise capacity. Conclusion(s): The fact that the exercise capacities in the COVID-19 group were similar to those in the control group, but there was a difference in the changes in heart rate and blood pressure, RPP, HRR1 suggested that the autonomic system might be affected.Copyright © 2022 by Heart and Health Foundation of Turkey.
ABSTRACT
Exercise is an integral part of metabolic syndrome (MetS) treatment. Recently, low-volume high-intensity interval training (LOW-HIIT) has emerged as a time-efficient approach to improving cardiometabolic health. Intensity prescriptions for LOW-HIIT are typically based on maximum heart rate (HRmax) percentages. However, HRmax determination requires maximal effort during exercise testing, which may not always be feasible/safe for MetS patients. This trial compared the effects of a 12-week LOW-HIIT program based on: (a) HRmax (HIIT-HR), or (b) submaximal lactate threshold (HIIT-LT), on cardiometabolic health and quality of life (QoL) in MetS patients. Seventy-five patients were randomized to HIIT-HR (5 × 1 min at 80-95% HRmax), HIIT-LT (5 × 1 min at 95-105% LT) groups, both performed twice weekly on cycle ergometers, or a control group (CON). All patients received nutritional weight loss consultation. All groups reduced their body weight (HIIT-HR: -3.9 kg, p < 0.001; HTT-LT: -5.6 kg, p < 0.001; CON: -2.6 kg, p = 0.003). The HIIT-HR and HIIT-LT groups similarly, improved their maximal oxygen uptake (+3.6 and +3.7 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001), glycohemoglobin (-0.2%, p = 0.005, and -0.3%, p < 0.001), homeostasis model assessment index (-1.3 units, p = 0.005, and -1.0 units, p = 0.014), MetS z-score (-1.9 and -2.5 units, p < 0.001) and QoL (+10 points, p = 0.029, and +11 points, p = 0.002), while the CON did not experience changes in these variables. We conclude that HIIT-LT is a viable alternative to HIIT-HR for patients who are not able/willing to undergo maximal exercise testing.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Few data have been published regarding the holistic approach of post- Covid patients, examining physical health. The purpose of our study was to examine the impact of arterial hypertension in the cardiopulmonary status of post-covid patients 3 months after the first day of infection. Design and Method: All participants who recovered Covid-19 infection underwent cardiorespiratory exercise using either Bruce or modified Bruce protocol where all parameters were evaluated and transthoracic echocardiogram. The population was separated into two groups based on history of hypertension. Group I (n = 29) included hypertensive subjects and Group II (n = 75) included normotensive subjects. Results and Conclusion: A total of 104 patients were assessed 3 months after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. We recorded a mean age of 49 ± 15 years, 50.5% of them were males, 8.7% had a history of coronary heart disease. Hypertensives had higher BMI (29.24 ± 24 vs 26.64 kg/m2 p < 0.01) and BSA (2.09 ± 0.25 vs. 1.95 ± 0.58, p = 0.001). They were hospitalized in higher percentage comparing to normotensives (72.4% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.01). Left atrial diameter (41 ± 6 vs. 35 ± 5.5 mm, p < 0.001) was significantly larger in hypertensives. Furthermore, A wave (79 ± 21 vs. 58 ± 18 cm/s p < 0.001) and ratios of E/A (1.01 ± 0.42 vs. 1.28 ± 0.44, p < 0.01) and E/E (7.3 ± 3.7 vs. 5.9 ± 4.3, p < 0.01) differed between two groups. Finally, LVEF (%) was significantly impaired in hypertensive comparing to normotesive subjects (53 ± 13% vs. 59 ± 7%). This finding was depicted in lower maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 22 ± 4.5 vs. 28 ± 8 ml/kg/min p < 0.001), metabolic equivalents (METS) at peak, 9.1 ± 3 vs. 14 ± 20 p < 0.001), maximum heart rate (maxHR 147 ± 17 vs. 165 ± 21 bpm p < 0.001) and HR1st minute recovery (123 ± 28 vs. 138 ± 21 bpm, p: 0.02) comparing to normotensive. Systolic blood pressure (SBP 180 ± 29 vs. 165 ± 25mmHg, p: 0.02) during the 1st minute of recovery was higher in hypertensives. Finally, the duration of exercise was significantly lower in patients with hypertension (7.3 ± 2.7 vs. 9 ± 4 min, p:0.02). To conclude, the current study highlighted the negative impact of hypertension in the ability to exercise. Regardless of the disease severity, post-covid patients need a comprehensive approach for rehabilitation including the modification of risk factors like hypertension and obesity.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and imposed restrictions influenced athletic societies, although current knowledge about mild COVID-19 consequences on cardiopulmonary and physiologic parameters remains inconclusive. This study aimed to assess the impact of mild COVID-19 inflection on cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) performance among endurance athletes (EA) with varied fitness level. Materials and Methods: 49 EA (nmale = 43, nfemale = 6, mean age = 39.94 ± 7.80 yr, height = 178.45 cm, weight = 76.62 kg; BMI = 24.03 kgm-2) underwent double treadmill or cycle ergometer CPET and body analysis (BA) pre- and post-mild COVID-19 infection. Mild infection was defined as: (1) without hospitalization and (2) without prolonged health complications lasting for >14 days. Speed, power, heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (VO2), pulmonary ventilation, blood lactate concentration (at the anaerobic threshold (AT)), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and maximum exertion were measured before and after COVID-19 infection. Pearson's and Spearman's r correlation coefficients and Student t-test were applied to assess relationship between physiologic or exercise variables and time. Results: The anthropometric measurements did not differ significantly before and after COVID-19. There was a significant reduction in VO2 at the AT and RCP (both p < 0.001). Pre-COVID-19 VO2 was 34.97 ± 6.43 ml kg·min-1, 43.88 ± 7.31 ml kg·min-1 and 47.81 ± 7.81 ml kg·min-1 respectively for AT, RCP and maximal and post-COVID-19 VO2 was 32.35 ± 5.93 ml kg·min-1, 40.49 ± 6.63 ml kg·min-1 and 44.97 ± 7.00 ml kg·min-1 respectively for AT, RCP and maximal. Differences of HR at AT (p < 0.001) and RCP (p < 0.001) was observed. The HR before infection was 145.08 ± 10.82 bpm for AT and 168.78 ± 9.01 bpm for RCP and HR after infection was 141.12 ± 9.99 bpm for AT and 165.14 ± 9.74 bpm for RCP. Time-adjusted measures showed significance for body fat (r = 0.46, p < 0.001), fat mass (r = 0.33, p = 0.020), cycling power at the AT (r = -0.29, p = 0.045), and HR at RCP (r = -0.30, p = 0.036). Conclusion: A mild COVID-19 infection resulted in a decrease in EA's CPET performance. The most significant changes were observed for VO2 and HR. Medical Professionals and Training Specialists should be aware of the consequences of a mild COVID-19 infection in order to recommend optimal therapeutic methods and properly adjust the intensity of training.
ABSTRACT
The measures adopted worldwide by COVID-19 were mainly focused on social distancing. However, these measures affected the physical preparation of the members of the Ecuadorian Army. This research aimed to analyze the incidence of high intensity intervallic training in military personnel who were in confinement through a quasi-experimental study applying a virtual training plan to improve physical condition. For this purpose, VO2 max (maximum oxygen consumption that the organism can absorb), CORE resistance strength (abdominal, lumbar, pelvic and gluteal muscles) and upper body resistance strength were evaluated. The results were statistically analyzed through the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, obtaining significant differences that allowed concluding that the virtual training plan had a positive impact on the physical condition of the military personnel and that it constitutes an effective alternative for the physical preparation of members of the Army in the context that is currently being experienced due to the pandemic. Copyright © 2022, Anka Publishers. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background and Aim: It is well known that Fontan patients tend to a sedentary lifestyle with low physical activity levels and their objec-tive exercise capacity is reduced. Currently the COVID-19 pandemic has a significant impact on the physical activity levels of the whole population. This study investigates physical activity lev-els of Fontan patients during the COVID-pandemic, and their relationship to exercise capacity, heart rates, cardiac function at cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and biomarkers. Method(s): CMR, exercise testing, 24h-ECG, and blood samples were prospectively performed in 38 Fontan patients, of which 15 were females (40%) and 18 (47%) had a single left ventricle (LV). Time interval from Fontan operation was in median (IQR) 10 (8-15) years. Physical activity was assessed by accelerom-eter during 7 consecutive days of regular school/work. Moderate intensity physical activity was defined as gt;2296 counts/minute and vigorous physical activity as gt;4012 counts/minute. Patients with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) below 60minutes per day were categorized as inactive as recom-mended by the WHO. Parameters of exercise capacity included maximal oxygen uptake, maximum work rate, and maximal heart rate. Result(s): Daily MVPA was in median (IQR) 40.2 (27.6-56.5) minutes and 7/18 (39%) patients reached the recommended 60minutes/day of MVPA. Daily minutes of MVPA did not cor-relate with gender, age, single left ventricle, years from Fontan sur-gery, mean heart rate, ventricular volumes, and ejection fraction at CMR, cardiac biomarkers, or exercise capacity. Conclusion(s): Only 39% of the Fontan patients meet the recommen-dation for daily MVPA. The MVPA during the pandemic in our patients' cohort is lower than the one reported in Fontan patients before the pandemic. These current changes in behavioral habits may increase the risk for habitual sedentary lifestyles in Fontan patients.
ABSTRACT
Background and Aim: Coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in paedi-atric population has a generally mild course. In Spain, patients under 15 years old have accounted only for 0,4% of hospital admis-sions and 0,7% of intensive care admissions. However, in May 2020, cases of children with a systemic inflammatory syndrome related to a recent COVID-19 infection were described. In severe forms, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, pericardial effusion and coronary artery dilatation or aneurysms have been described. The aim of this study is to describe the results obtained in cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in previously healthy patients with PIMS. Method(s): Prospective study of PIMS patients who performed CPET. Godfrey ramp protocol recommended by European Society of Cardiology (ESC) was used in all cases. Measured var-iables, expressed by predicted values, were: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume (FEV1), ratio of minute venti-lation to carbon dioxide production (VE/VO2 slope), maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), oxygen pulse (O2 pulse) and maximum heart rate (HR). Result(s): Eight patients (75% boys) aged 5-14 years (median 10,5 years) performed CPET reaching a mean peak load of 105,87 W (median 112,5 W and mean load per kg of weight 2,34 W/kg). Only 1 patient (12,5%) presented basal spirometric disturb-ances in context of asthma without chronic treatment. Obtained mean respiratory parameters were: FVC 97,88%, FEV1 92,7%, Tiffeneau 83% and VECO2p 32,47. Oxygen satu-ration before and after CPET was greater than 95% in 100% of patients. In 6 patients (75%) the V02max and oxygen pulse was greater than 80% of predicted value (100% of patients reached at least 40% of V02 max at anaerobic threshold). Obtained mean cardiovascular parameters were: VO2 max 1624mL/min (median 1655 ml/min and V02 per kg of weight 36,9 ml/kg), pulse oxygen 9 ml and OUES 1,92. Conclusion(s): PIMS may cause severe cardiac disturbances justifying cardiological monitoring of these patients. CPET allows to assess functional capacity of these children after the disease. In our serie, most of patients had a good functional capacity (75%). Studies with more patients are needed to make extended conclusions.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Few data have been published regarding the holistic approach of post- Covid patients, examining physical health. The purpose of our study was to examine the impact of arterial hypertension in the cardiopulmonary status of post-covid patients 3 months after the first day of infection. Design and method: All participants who recovered Covid-19 infection underwent cardiorespiratory exercise using either Bruce or modified Bruce protocol where all parameters were evaluated and transthoracic echocardiogram. The population was separated into two groups based on history of hypertension. Group I (n = 29) included hypertensive subjects and Group II (n = 75) included normotensive subjects. Results: A total of 104 patients were assessed 3 months after the onset of COVID- 19 symptoms. We recorded a mean age of 49 ± 15 years, 50.5% of them were males, 8.7% had a history of coronary heart disease. Hypertensives had higher BMI (29.24 ± 24 vs 26.64 kg/m2, p < 0.01) and BSA (2.09 ± 0.25 vs. 1.95 ± 0.58, p = 0.001). They were hospitalized in higher percentage comparing to normotensives (72.4% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.01). Left atrial diameter (41 ± 6 vs. 35 ± 5.5 mm, p < 0.001) was significantly larger in hypertensives. Furthermore, A wave (79 ± 21 vs. 58 ± 18 cm/s, p < 0.001) and ratios of E/A (1.01 ± 0.42 vs. 1.28 ± 0.44, p < 0.01) and E/E' (7.3 ± 3.7 vs. 5.9 ± 4.3, p < 0.01) differed between two groups. Finally, LVEF (%) was significantly impaired in hypertensive comparing to normotesive subjects (53 ± 13% vs. 59 ± 7%). This finding was depicted in lower maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 22 ± 4.5 vs.28 ± 8 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001), metabolic equivalents (METS) at peak, 9.1 ± 3 vs. 14 ± 20, p < 0.001), maximum heart rate (maxHR 147 ± 17 vs. 165 ± 21 bpm, p < 0.001) and HR1st minute recovery (123 ± 28 vs. 138 ± 21 bpm, p: 0.02) comparing to normotensive. Systolic blood pressure (SBP, 180 ± 29 vs. 165 ± 25mmHg, p: 0.02) during the 1st minute of recovery was higher in hypertensives. Finally, the duration of exercise was significantly lower in patients with hypertension (7.3 ± 2.7 vs. 9 ± 4 min, p:0.02) Conclusions: the current study highlighted the negative impact of hypertension in the ability to exercise. Regardless of the disease severity, post-covid patients need a comprehensive approach for rehabilitation including the modification of risk factors like hypertension and obesity.
ABSTRACT
Background: Chemotherapy for breast cancer can have a detrimental effect on cardiorespiratory fitness. VO2max (maximal oxygen consumption measured during exercise) is a key predictor of cardiovascular risk and has been found to be lower in women with a history of breast cancer compared with healthy women. Chemotherapy is associated with a decrease in VO2max but these decreases may be attenuated with exercise training, such as resistance, aerobic and high-intensity interval training programs. Physical activity may reduce the risk of mortality for breast cancer patients, improve quality of life (QoL) and reduce weight. All gyms and fitness studios had to close due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and while some have re-opened, many patients are not comfortable returning to an exercise facility now and are incorporating virtual exercise into their routine. Prior studies have demonstrated the safety, feasibility and potential benefits of home-based exercise programs for breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. However, many of these programs are self-reported, which can create bias and to our knowledge, there is no existing data on the effect of home-based exercise programs for breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The goal of the STRENGTH Trial is to evaluate the effect of a 12-week virtual supervised exercise program in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy on cardiorespiratory fitness. Study Description: This is a single-center, prospective, single-arm study designed to Sevaluate the effect of a virtual supervised exercise training program in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy on cardiorespiratory fitness. All participants are assigned to a 12-week virtual supervised exercise program and asked to complete a total of 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity per week, as a combination of a weekly virtual personal training sessionand workout classes streamed from the Peloton®Digital platform (i.e. walking, running, cardio, yoga, strength training, and cycling classes). Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, cardiorespiratory fitness cannot be assessed using a cardiopulmonary exercise test. As such, the co-primary endpoints are resting blood pressure and heart rate and distance walked during a Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), which is measured at the start and completion of the 12-week supervised exercise program. Secondary endpoints are QoL as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and symptom management assessment by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). Several exploratory clinical endpoints will be collected including adherence to the program, type of fitness classes completed, and treatment toxicities. Eligibility Criteria: Patients aged ≥18 years with stage I to IV breast cancer who are planned to receive at least 12 weeks of chemotherapy of investigator's choice are eligible for inclusion. Patients who have an ejection fraction on echocardiogram <40%, symptomatic heart failure, myocarditis, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism or COVID-19 infection within past 3 months, severe, uncorrected valvular disease, uncontrolled hypertension and/or uncontrolled arrhythmias are excluded. Statistical Methods: Continuous and categorical variables measured in this study will be summarized. The distributions of the data collected in the study participants from the 6MWT, FACT-G and MDASI will be evaluated. Based upon the findings, either paired t-tests or nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be performed to analyze the differences observed between the pre-exercise intervention data and the post-exercise intervention data. P values <= 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Accrual: At this time, 20 patients have enrolled out of a planned 30 participants.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Cardiovascular (CV) disease has conventionally been a pathology associated with older adults, but recent evidence has shown that younger individuals are developing CV issues. One of the factors contributing to this epidemic may be the increased time constraints placed on young adults. Specifically, the sedentary activity of full-time students may be causing detrimental effects to their health, including increasing the risk for CV disease. The COVID-19 pandemic has added quarantine restrictions that have further increased the risk for CV disease. The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of COVID-19 restrictions on The University of Texas at El Paso's (UTEP) Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' health outcomes. The proposed study's objectives are: to determine differences in fitness capacity, body composition, physical activity levels, and fear of COVID during and after strict COVID-19 restrictions. We hypothesize that COVID-19 quarantine restrictions will produce detrimental effects of DPT students' health outcomes. NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: Using convenience sampling, 18 participants were recruited via online meetings and emails from UTEP's DPT class of 2023. Following the first round, 2 participants dropped out, leaving 16 subjects for data analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal study required 2 visits (during strict restrictions (Nov. 2020) and 3 months after restrictions were lifted (July 2021)). Primary outcome measures were cardiorespiratory fitness levels, measured via maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), and body composition measured via Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and BMI. Secondary outcome measures were the International Physical Activity Questionnaire to assess physical activity levels and a validated fear of COVID survey. A paired t-test for each variable was performed to determine differences in health outcomes. RESULTS: After a period of 7 months, participants' VO2max (41.66, SD = 8.43, P = 0.013), BMI (25.20, SD = 3.29, P = 0.016), and moderate physical activity minutes per week (935.94, SD = 733.36, P = 0.01) increased. No significant changes in participants' fear of COVID-19 was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Following the removal of quarantine restrictions, significant increases in aerobic capacity and moderate exercise time were likely observed due to increased workout facility availability, more in-person learning, and increased social interaction. While BMI increased, body fat % remained statistically unchanged, suggesting BMI gains stemmed from muscle mass increasing. Moreover, the unchanged fear of COVID-19 suggests it was not significantly affecting the participants' activity levels;rather, the easing of restrictions was likely a critical factor improving their health. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that easing the COVID-19 restrictions can have a positive impact on DPT studentsv health and potentially mitigate CV risk factors;reflecting the importance of accessibility for students' health and how similar educational programs react to future health crises.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 has affected the whole world as a global health pandemic in 2020. A nationwide home confinement was declared in our country by beginning of March. Cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP) had to adapt to new health requirements and the impact of these changes is unknown. Purpose: To analyse the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in improvement of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with maximal oxygen consumption uptake (VO2max) and control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with cardiovascular established disease (coronary heart disease, heart failure or cardiac surgery) included in the phase II of our centre CRP. Methods: 510 consecutive patients were evaluated. A maximal CPET was performed for each patient from the beginning and at the end of phase II of CRP. Enrolled patients were divided in two groups: from March 2019 to March 2020 (before Covid pandemic) and second one, from the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 until February 2021. Results: 296 patients were studied in preCovid group and 214 patients were studied in Covid group. There were no statistically significant differences between these two groups in reference to cardiovascular risk factors and medical treatment (Figure 1). 82.7% of patients completed a hospital-based program in preCovid group vs 36% in Covid (p=0.001). Comparing the percentage of patients that accomplished the risk factors control targets between pre- and Covid group, statistically significant differences have been seen referring to systolic BP <140mmHg (85.1 vs 95.4%, p=0.001) and cLDL <70 mg/dl (67.2 vs 77.7%, p=0.003). However, in terms of glucose control (fasting blood glucose <110 mg/dl: 78.4 vs 82.2%, p=0.612;HbA1c <7%: 90.7 vs 92.7%, p=0.464) and weight control (BMI: 27.8±4.69 kg/m2 vs 27.3±4.07 kg/m2, p=0.299) this could not be established. There were no differences in psychological attention demand (27 vs 23.3%, p=0.695). Statistical differences between two groups were found in terms of VO2max at the beginning phase II CPET (22.7±7 vs 20±5 ml/min/kg, p=0.006) and ending phase II CPET (24±7 vs 21±6, p=0.001). Nevertheless, no differences were found in the final phase II CPET improvement between both groups (1.4±4.1 ml/kg/min vs 0.81±2.9 ml/kg/min;p=0.221) (Figure 2). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 changed our practice from an in-hospital based phase II CRP to a home-based phase II CRP. COVID-19 pandemic had no negative impact in the control of risk factors in our phase II patients. In our experience, despite preCovid phase II patients have a better functional capacity in terms of VO2max, the improvement in VO2max after phase II CRP persists in the SARS-CoV-2 era. This might show that an accurate structure of home-based program could also have great results. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
During the pandemic, several studies were carried out on the short-term effects of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in athletes. As some cases of young athletes with serious complications like myocarditis or thromboembolism and even sudden death were reported, strict recommendations for return to sport were published. However, we have less data about athletes who have already returned to high-intensity trainings after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Athletes underwent cardiology screening (personal history, physical examination, 12-lead resting ECG, laboratory tests with necroenzyme levels and echocardiography) 2 to 3 weeks after suffering a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In case of negative results, they were advised to start low intensity trainings and increase training intensity regularly until achieving maximal intensity a minimum of 3 weeks later. A second step of cardiology screening was also carried out after returning to maximal intensity trainings. The above mentioned screening protocol was repeated and was completed with vita maxima cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on running treadmill. If the previous examinations indicated, 24h Holter ECG recording, 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or cardiac MR imaging were also carried out. Data are presented as mean±SD. Two-step screening after SARS-CoV-2 infection was carried out in 111 athletes (male:74, age:22.4±7.4y, elite athlete:90%, training hours:14.8±5.8 h/w, ice hockey players:31.5%, water polo players:22.5%, wrestlers:18.9%, basketball players:18.0%). Second screenings were carried out 94.5±31.5 days after the first symptoms of the infection. A 5% of the athletes was still complaining of tiredness and decreased exercise capacity. Resting heart rate was 70.3±13.0 b.p.m., During CPET examinations, athletes achieved a maximal heart rate of 187.3±11.6 b.p.m., maximal relative aerobic capacity of 49.2±5.5 ml/kg/min, and maximal ventilation of 138.6±31.2 l/min. The athletes reached their anaerobic threshold at 87.8±6.3% of their maximal aerobic capacity, with a heart rate of 93.3±3.7% of their maximal values. Heart rate recovery was 29.9±9.2/min. During the CPET examinations, short supraventricular runs, repetititve ventricular premature beats + ventricular quadrigeminy and inferior ST depression were found in 1-1 cases. Slightly higher pulmonary pressure was measured on the echocardiography in 4 cases. Hypertension requiring drug treatment was found in 5.4% of the cases. Laboratory examinations revealed decreased vitamin D3 levels in 26 cases, decreased iron storage levels in 18 athletes. No SARS-CoV-2 infection related CMR changes were revealed in our athlete population. Three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, most of the athletes examined had satisfactory fitness levels. However, some cases of decreased exercise capacity, decreased vitamin D3 or iron storage levels, arrhythmias, hypertension and elevated pulmonary pressure requiring further examinations, treatment or follow-up were revealed.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research was to develop the 3 min incremental step-in-place (3MISP) test for predicting maximal oxygen uptake (V.O2max). A total of 205 adults (20-64 years) completed the 3MISP and V.O2max tests. Using age, gender, body composition (BC) including percent body fat (PBF) or body mass index (BMI), and with or without heart rate (HR) at the beginning of exercise (HR0) or difference between HR at the third minute during the exercise and the first minute post exercise (ΔHR3 - HR4) in the 3MISP test, six V.O2max prediction models were derived from multiple linear regression. Age (r = -0.239), gender (r = 0.430), BMI (r = -0.191), PBF (r = -0.706), HR0 (r = -0.516), and ΔHR3 - HR4 (r = 0.563) were significantly correlated to V.O2max. Among the six V.O2max prediction models, the PBF model∆HR3 - HR4 has the highest accuracy. The simplest models with age, gender, and PBF/BMI explained 54.5% of the V.O2max in the PBF modelBC and 39.8% of that in the BMI modelBC. The addition of HR0 and ∆HR3 - HR4 increases the variance of V.O2max explained by the PBF and BMI models∆HR3 - HR4 by 17.98% and 45.23%, respectively, while standard errors of estimate decrease by 10.73% and 15.61%. These data demonstrate that the models established using 3MISP-HR data can enhance the accuracy of V.O2max prediction.
Subject(s)
Cardiorespiratory Fitness , Exercise , Exercise Test , Oxygen , Oxygen ConsumptionABSTRACT
Wearing face masks is recommended for the prevention of contracting or exposing others to cardiorespiratory infections, such as COVID-19. Controversy exists on whether wearing face masks during vigorous exercise affects performance. We used a randomized, counterbalanced cross-over design to evaluate the effects of wearing a surgical mask, a cloth mask, or no mask in 14 participants (7 men and 7 women; 28.2 ± 8.7 y) during a cycle ergometry test to exhaustion. Arterial oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry) and tissue oxygenation index (indicator of hemoglobin saturation/desaturation) at vastus lateralis (near-infrared spectroscopy) were assessed throughout the exercise tests. Wearing face masks had no effect on performance (time to exhaustion (mean ± SD): no mask 622 ± 141 s, surgical mask 657 ± 158 s, cloth mask 637 ± 153 s (p = 0.20); peak power: no mask 234 ± 56 W, surgical mask 241 ± 57 W, cloth mask 241 ± 51 W (p = 0.49)). When expressed relative to peak exercise performance, no differences were evident between wearing or not wearing a mask for arterial oxygen saturation, tissue oxygenation index, rating of perceived exertion, or heart rate at any time during the exercise tests. Wearing a face mask during vigorous exercise had no discernable detrimental effect on blood or muscle oxygenation, and exercise performance in young, healthy participants (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04557605).